Why I’m voting Green today

I believe we are faced with two serious and urgent problems – climate change and inequality.

These have major implications for our security and stability – at local, national and global scales.

The Green Party has a deep-rooted commitment to tackling environmental problems, as well as a concern for social justice. Importantly, it makes the connections between the two.

The party’s manifesto sets out, in chapter one, a coherent green philosophy and an inspiring case for change – read it here, it’s just two pages – 8 and 9

The Green Party’s vision is sometimes described as utopian – well that’s fine by me! But the manifesto is also stuffed full of good, sensible ideas, on everything from energy to transport, from health to education. Oh and it’s all costed – over six pages in the financial appendix.

For me, these lines, from that first chapter of the manifesto, sum up the slow erosion of civic values that has taken place and the need for something better:

“Back in the 1970s a determined assault on public life began, and the market became the model and measure of life. Since then, successive governments of all colours have found ways to justify and deepen the role of the market in our lives.

The market has been in charge for so long that it dominates our imagination and colours our view of ourselves. The market is short sighted and short term. It’s time for change – time to put the market to work for the common good and for people to be put back in charge.

It’s hard to be a citizen when life tells you that you are a consumer

It’s hard to think of others when we are pitted against one another and sold the lie that individuals are to blame for their misfortunes

It’s hard to think of the common good when it’s never mentioned.

The market makes us impatient with the suffering of others, tolerant of inequality, prone to prejudice, suspicious of difference. We know we can be cooperative, appreciative, understanding and fair. We just need a world that encourages us to be these things. Together we can create that world.”

If we want to see change we need to vote for it. We need long-term thinking. We need more green voices, in Parliament and locally. That’s why I’m voting for the Green Party today.

Green connections: from London to Liverpool

Last week I spent a day at Ecobuild and then took a train to Liverpool for the Green Party’s Spring conference. In the midst of Excel’s vast halls beside the Thames there was some deep green thinking going on and at the ACC, on the banks of the Mersey, social justice was as much discussed as the environment.

IMG_2307 cropped

At Ecobuild, Deloitte Real Estate Partner Miles Keeping (second from right above) presented an assessment of the political parties’ policies on sustainability – essentially carbon reduction. Almost without exception the Green Party topped the tables.

Keeping also quoted a recent survey of over 800 industry professionals by the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment which found that more than half thought Natalie Bennett of the Green Party shows the strongest leadership on climate change. The Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour leaders earned just 23% of the vote combined.

Throughout the day, speakers at Ecobuild made the connections between individual behaviour and wellbeing, building performance and climate change. If asset value, not cost savings, is what really drives change, as Richard Francis of Monomoy Company said, then surely the planet is the ultimate asset.

At times the arena at Excel took on the flavour of a political meeting as when Paul Mason, economics editor at Channel 4 News, called for regulatory intervention to create ‘post-capitalism’: “The market needs re-structuring and supressing,” he said in a session entitled People, the planet and the banks: are they mutually exclusive? Phrases you don’t normally hear at a building trade show.

IMG_2308 cropped

The distance between Mason (centre above) and Andrew Sentance (right above, former member of the MPC) was stark. Sentance places his faith in markets but wants growth to be “reasonably shared”. Mason says markets are not allocating resources to where they’re needed.

At the Green Party Conference in Liverpool, Molly Scott Cato, an economist and Green MEP for the South West, took the diagnosis (and the prescription) further. The Green Party’s policy on the economy is characterised as zero growth – it’s actually more nuanced than that. See http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/ec.html

IMG_2356 cropped

The aim is essentially zero net growth, says Cato. This is not the same as no growth, anywhere. Growth is clearly needed in some areas – sustainable housing, better public transport and environmental protection for example, but should be balanced by reducing wasteful consumption and damaging development.

Beyond that, the Greens want to replace GNP as an indicator of progress/prosperity as it doesn’t adequately measure people’s sense of well-being. They would look to alternative indicators that seek to provide a picture of how we are progressing towards sustainability, equity, and happiness.

In Liverpool Kate Raworth, proponent of Doughnut Economics asked simply “What does progress look like?” It’s balance not simply a rising line, she said.

At Ecobuild the panel essayed some solutions to the growth/sustainability conundrum including green capital accounting; an ‘entrepreneurial state’ that invests in major projects such as renewable energy; pricing externalities and a Nature and Wellbeing Act currently being promoted by UK conservation charities.

In London and Liverpool, I was encouraged by how much common ground there is between those working on energy efficiency, sustainability and wellbeing in the built environment and those working in local, national and European politics to bring about a sustainable future.